Category Archives: General Environmental Reference

REPORT ON EARTHWORKS FRACKING ACTION TOUR AROUND WINDSOR JUNE 6

Earthworks OGI Camera Set Up for Field Observation

On June 6, the Larimer Alliance co-hosted an Earthworks Fracking Action Tour with 350 Colorado and Green Latinos

We hosted a tour group of twelve to joing Andrew Klooster, Earthworks Colorado Field Advocate, on a tour of two active oil and gas operations outside of Windsor, Colorado. Andrew demonstrated their Optical Gas Imaging camera, which uses FLIR branded infrared photography to make emissions from oil and gas facilities visible.
Following the observations at the active sites, our group took a look at the proposed Century site where Verdad Resources is planning a 22-well pad with associated infrastructure in near proximity to residential areas and schools. Although nominally outside of the 2,000 foot legal setback from homes and other vulnerable structures, we all know the emissions and other deleterious effects of such an operation will range much farther than that. Ā 
Emissions observed from the flaring stack on the left. Nominally an enclosed combustion device, this one’s igniter was not working, so the burning of extraneous methane was not happening.
Even when operating properly, emissions can still be observed from oil and gas operations
The image seen above, showing emissions from the combustion stack of a separator unit, was captured the day before our tour. Upon our arrival on site, he focused again on the same stack and saw the emissions were still happening. He explained that the separators are what will divide what is drawn up from a wellbore into oil, the "produced water" or waste fracking fluid, and extraneous methane deemed unusable. Each separator has a flaring device which burns off the methane, which is a greenhouse gas even more problematic than carbon. In this instance, the igniter for the flare is not functioning, so the methane is just drifting off into the atmosphere. . . it disperses fairly quickly, but is more pervasive. 
Andrew explained he encounters this frequently, and brings such instances to the attention of the operators and Colorado's Air Pollution Control Division. However, the operators feel no obligation to respond to his reports of such violations until the regulatory agency leans on them, and they are given a grace period to respond before it is actually treated and fined as a violation. Beyond that, the combustion processes in the flaring devices are imperfect at best, so you are still getting both carbon and unburned methane out of these stacks. 
He also observed some emissions from the tank battery on site that held produced water. This site was going to get a violation report presented to the APCD. The enforcement processes are slow, and the division relies on the companies to self-monitor and report as their staff is stretched thin across all the 45,000 plus active wells in the state of Colorado. Andrew also made clear that the air pollution monitoring is only brought on line when the well goes into production. Emissions of all sorts from the bore and the equipment used in drilling and hauling away waste are not monitored during the drilling phase.
Andrew Klooster of Eathworks setting up his OGI camera at first field observation site
Everyone on the tour had the opportunity to view the emissions through the OGI camera
Andrew is a ready font of information on the processes, and what he encounters when making his observations.
The second site observed was viewed from the sidewalk right outside a residential neighborhood. While nominally beyond the setback limit, that is still clearly too close for comfort!
Following the tour we met to discuss what we had learned at Peculier Ales in Windsor
Well, this was actually before the tour, but we were on the front porch of Peculier Ales.

We had been by the site of the proposed Century pad on the West side of Windsor, at the intersection of County Road 15 and Harmony Road. We had a few concerned Windsor residents on hand for this expedition, and they are seeking support for their efforts to stop this 22-well monstrosity from going in near their homes and schools. Sandra Duggan of 350 Colorado gave us a briefing on their Safe and Healthy Colorado communications program as well as the upcoming Here and Now Tour in support of their Make Polluters Pay campaign. This is seeking to establish a state level climate superfund to get polluters of all sorts to pony up for the damage to our health and environment they have caused. Patricia Garcia Nelson spoke to the continued efforts of Green Latinos to rein in the egregious pollution of the Suncor refinery in Commerce City, as well as pushing back against ongoing oil and gas development around our state, and the harm it brings to disproportionately impacted communities.

Stay tuned for more updates on activity centered on the Verdad Resources proposed Century well pad. Their application has been filed with the Energy and Carbon Management Commission. Although we are outside the legal jurisdiction in Weld County, local residents who wish to counter this will need our support. And as we all know, those emissions don’t just stay in Weld!

Erie Protectors get some help — from The Guardian

It has taken some time — about 20 years — for the efforts of Christiaan van Woudenberg and the Erie Protectors (see erieprotectors.com) to finally gain some traction in the mainstream media; but that landed with authority in this recent article in The Guardian, an established international newspaper with an historic reputation for hard hitting investigative journalism:

There are thousands of dirty old drill sites in Colorado. The state gave oil firms a $1bn pass

 

I invite you to read the article for its informed recounting of an under-reported issue: the cost of cleaning up the huge backlog of abandoned or low producing O&G wells in Colorado. This has been a known issue among the activist community for years, but has been overshadowed by other political events (to say the least). Nonetheless, it points to the obvious: there is growing political awareness of the need to get the O&G to pay its fair share of the environmental costs to all of us; and to pull back the curtain of darkness over the regulatory agencies that have been covering this up and blocking much needed action.

I first met Christiaan several years back, after I had moved to Fort Collins; but I could relate to deep seated frustration and anger over how his dream house neighborhood had been turned into a nightmare by nearby fracking activity. I lived in nearby Lafayette, about 10 miles south, from 2004 to 2018, and knew that the town of Erie had a split personality: half of it is in Boulder County and half in Weld County. The two counties, as most locals know, are diametrically opposite in their local political leadership over O&G development — and fracking. Unfortunately for Christiaan, his house is in the Weld County side, but which misfortune he had no idea of when he and his family moved there in 2007.

So it was with deep understanding and sympathy that accompanied my learning of Christiaan’s story; and I have deeply admired his commitment and skills and tenacity that he has brought to this struggle. He has not given up, and has provided additional encouragement to the dozens of other committed activists who are fighting an uneven battle against the O&G industry in Colorado in the years since.

What the above article documents is how the state agency that regulates O&G — the ECMC, or Energy Carbon and Management Commission — is deeply corrupt, and continues to coddle and protect this industry that has outlived its economic purpose, but which tenaciously clings to its economic life through deceit, subterfuge and outright lying to the public.

How long will the people of Colorado put up with this? How can they allow such blatant shunting of costs from those who are causing the pollution onto public taxpayers? This is what this report reveals, in all its lurid detail, how the ECMC, knowingly and with full awareness of what they were doing, failed to collect over $1 billion in fines from the O&G industry, which was rightfully owed.

To put that in perspective, the entire state budget for Colorado is around $40-42 billion. If the ECMC had been doing its job, this past year’s budget cuts that had to be made, around $850 million to $1 billion, would have been greatly alleviated if they had forced the O&G to cough up what it should paid — after, of course, the industry has paid for the remediation of the thousands on under-producing O&G wells have been properly plugged and cleaned up.

How long with the good people of Colorado allow themselves to be deceived by the ECMC? We should be demanding that our state legislators hold the O&G industry to account, and make them pay for the cost of abandoned O&G wells. As well as paying for better monitoring programs that should be in place for telling us how badly we are being poisoned.

 

How much water is used for fracking in Colorado?

Subtitle: How much water does it take to start being scary?

As Colorado endures the lowest snowpack in its history, and begins to enter the 2026 summer fire season, water has become a prime concern for many. And now that the future of the Colorado River itself is in doubt, and the seven Western states that are part of the Colorado River Compact apparently unable to reach an agreement by its own deadline, there is ever more impetus for the states water leaders to look seriously at their water use policies.

Having been involved in anti-fracking activism since 2012, I have come to learn about the prodigious amounts of fresh water that is consumed by fracking. Although I can tell you that one frack job on a typical well can consume 5 to 8 millions gallons of water — and now that statistic has climbed to 15 to 20 millions of gallons of water per well in current use — such numbers may simply go in one ear and come out the other. The human mind is not made to have a feel for what such large numbers mean.

The human mind, in fact, is much better at processing images than numbers. Which is why I began a project that would attempt to visualize the amount of water used in fracking for the state.

With the help of several activist colleagues with technical skills, I was able to progress in this project this year…and create this visualization with their help:

Statewide water use of fracking compared to Denver residential water use

What this graph shows is that statewide use of water in fracking is comparable — and can even exceed — the amount of water consumed by Denver residents in a given year. And, if you were not aware, this water is taken forever out of the hydrologic cycle, never to return….never. As in, forever.

The regulation of water use in fracking has not received the same attention as the other negative environmental effects of fracking, such as the noise, air and water pollution and truck traffic. As such, the data itself has only recently begun to be available, from organizations such as FracFocus (see fracfocus.org). Among the Colorado environmental activist community, the specious data reportingĀ  by the industry is a well known and obvious fact of life. The industry needs to be reporting its data more reliably and with greater transparency.

What Colorado’s policy setters need to consider is if allowing this industry to continue throwing away billions of gallons of water every year is in its own environmental best interests. To my mind, this is simply an insane use of water in a climate that is going to become more and more dry with each passing year, which is what the climate science predicts.Ā  Water is life — and we should be guarding it with our own lives.

DATA TABLES

The numerical data tables for the above graphs are shown here:

COLORADO WATER USE FOR FRACKING, 2012-2023Ā 
yeargallonsbillions
20121,296,620,479.241.3
20135,259,007,798.545.26
20146,640,304,994.856.64
20156,238,368,957.206.24
20165,354,258,926.115.35
201711,580,540,366.8611.58
201813,611,946,880.8313.61
201912,994,692,196.8412.99
20206,984,377,209.166.98
202110,934,751,410.3410.93
202210,873,881,470.0610.87
202313,313,894,765.5513.31
202412,635,105,779.7312.64
202512,104,661,504.0812.1
SOURCE: FracFocus.org
DENVER RESIDENTIAL WATER USE, 2012-2023
Residential_Water_Use
yeargallonsbillion gallons
201214,052,609,00014.053
201311,629,361,00011.629
201411,603,885,00011.604
201511,359,464,00011.359
201612,435,755,00012.436
201712,330,988,00012.331
201812,874,463,00012.874
201912,140,925,00012.141
202014,174,959,00014.175
202112,815,473,00012.815
202213,051,564,00013.052
202311,106,173,00011.106
SOURCE: Denver Water CAFR tables, Based on ChatGPT inquiry, 2/10/2026